HIGHLY SENSITIVE LAWSUIT WITH EXPLOSIVE
Posted By: Rayelan <Send
Date: Wednesday, 18 August 2004, 11:16 p.m.
HIGHLY SENSITIVE LAWSUIT WITH EXPLOSIVE
RAMIFICATIONS SET FOR ORAL ARGUMENT BEFORE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, NEW YORK CITY,
AUGUST 24, 2004
A highly sensitive lawsuit was filed in the U.S. district court in New York
City by a former federal agent, Rodney Stich, seeking to report criminal
activities in government offices. This is a very unusual lawsuit, and has the
potential of exposing criminal activities in the three branches of government.
Basically, here are some of the highlights in that federal action:
Stich initially discovered deep-seated corruption in the government's
aviation safety offices after he was given the assignment to correct the
conditions that were at that time resulting in the nation's worst series of
airline crashes. These were the same problems that later created the conditions
enabling terrorists to seize four airliners on 9/11.
Obviously, the hijackings of four airliners were aviation disasters, for
which the preventative measures were known for years, the need existed for
years, and the authority and responsibility to order the preventative measures
were in the same government aviation safety offices that Stich discovered and
documented areas of deep-seated corruption. Instead of addressing these areas,
Congress and the 9/11 commission focused on the secondary and more innocent
areas: the so-called intelligence failures and failures to act on known
Attempting to expose the corruption in government offices, Stich published
books and appeared as guest and expert on over 3,000 radio and television shows
since 1978. These exposure activities caused other government agents to provide
him with additional information and evidence of corruption in other government
offices and in covert government activities. These agents were from the FBI,
CIA, DEA, Customs, Secret Service, and elsewhere in government.
Stich sought to circumvent the cover-ups by members of Congress and Justice
Department personnel by filing federal actions under the federal crime reporting
statute (18 U.S.C. § 4). That statute states that anyone knowing of a federal
crime must promptly report it to a federal judge or other federal officer.
Instead of receiving this information, federal judges blocked the reports
and commenced retaliatory actions against Stich. In this way the corruption
continued, along with the deadly consequences in the aviation and other
government sectors. The hijackings of 9/11 were one day's blowback consequences
from the corruption that Stich and his group of other former government agents
sought to report.
After 9/11, Stich again attempted to report the criminal activities and the
role of federal judges in covering up for them. His Complaint, filed in the U.S.
district court in New York City, was blocked, and dismissed without a hearing.
Stich then filed a notice of appeal, submitted written arguments, and the case
is set for oral argument at 10 a.m. on August 24, 2004.
There is much more to these events, some of which can be found at www.defraudingamerica.com, and more in the books that Stich has written, including Defrauding America; Drugging America; Unfriendly Skies;
and Blowback, 9/11, Iraq, Lies and Cover-ups.
Additional information on this lawsuit, including the Complaint and briefs,
can be found at www.defraudingamerica.com
This lawsuit has the possibility of forcing attention to many areas of
corruption in various government offices, including the real blame for the
success of the hijackers on 9/11. If enough publicity was given to these
matters, attention could be forced upon many other areas of corruption in
government that continue to inflict great harm upon people in the United States.
Anyone can help by notifying the media of this hearing and encouraging people
to attend. There may not be another opportunity like this to focus attention on
such serious matters.
The case in the U.S. Court of Appeals is known as Stich v. United States,
Docket number 03-6244 CV, and is calendared for oral argument at 10 a.m.
Evidence is mounting that the Bush administration manipulated evidence that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction in the months leading up to the preemptive attack.
Click here to sign our petition urging Senators Frist and Daschle to convene a select Senate committee immediately, with sufficient funding and investigative power, to learn the truth about what the Bush administration really knew about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Many of you have heard in the news that some of the information used as a rationale for war in Iraq may have been false. In fact, recent statements by the CIA* suggest that President Bush knowingly used unreliable information about Iraq during his 2003 State of the Union address to increase public and congressional support for war. The American people need to know if this is indeed true.
It is important to know if we can TRUST our President to tell the absolute truth, especially during these times of terrorism and instability. We can not allow our loved ones and our country to be exposed to danger unless it is TRULY a necessity.
An independent committee should investigate the truth behind information that led the U.S. to war in Iraq to know if we can entrust our lives and those of our loved ones to the orders of our President. More upheaval and unrest lies in our future, and we must know whom to trust.
Sign petition requesting an independent investigation and enforcement of appropriate legal punishments for this crime. Sign this petition to call for an INDEPENDENT BIPARTISAN Commission to help discover the truth!
Go to: George W. Bush Charged with High Treason for Complicity in the Attack of 911
Once you have signed, please forward this petition to all your friends and family! This effort will succeed by word of mouth and every person counts.